Speaking English, But Not Really

To be honest all theistic propositions ought to being with this disclaimer:

Warning: what I'm about to say will sound like English, but I won't really be speaking English. When I use words like exist, intelligence, design, being, good, and the like, they should not be mistaken for the homonyms that you know. Human beings form concepts ultimately from their sensory material (guided by the principles implicit in that experience, namely, the law of identity and its corollaries). Those concepts are then used to build wider and more abstract concepts based on shared characteristics. Concepts therefore cannot simply be ripped from this hierarchical context and applied to a realm that is said to be in principle beyond anyone's sensory experience, indeed beyond reality itself. Therefore, our normal concepts cannot be the same as the homonyms used to describe the "supernormal" or God. You've been cautioned. 

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 9, 2020 at 9:42 AM

    I like the way you have laid it out. My takeaway from what you have said here is that since God is beyond my sensory experience that there is no way for me to know that God exists. Even if God revealed Himself to me, there would be no way for me to know that it was God revealing Himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sheldon RichmanJune 9, 2020 at 10:33 AM

      No, I'm making a much more basic point. We cannot think or talk about something that "exists" outside of or beyond existence, that is, the natural world. What would the word "exist" even mean here? It would be like saying that we can't know if square circles exist. The term "square circle" has no content; it is literal nonsense. The same is true for "God." By the theists' own terms, it has no coherent content. We can't even say, "There is no way for me to know that God exists." "God" is just noise, gibberish. So it's not that there is no way for us to know that God exists. It's that there's nothing to know because nothing has been said. See my posts "What If ...? Is Not an Argument" and "The Problem with God Talk."

      Thanks for the comment!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Impossibility of Illogical Thought

Thought can never be of anything illogical, since, if it were, we should have to think illogically. It used to be said that God could create anything except what would be contrary to the laws of logic. The truth is that we could not say what an 'illogical' world would look like. It is as impossible to represent in language anything that 'contradicts logic' as it is in geometry to represent by its a coordinates a figure that contradicts the laws of space, or to give the coordinates of a point that does not exist.... In a certain sense, we cannot make mistakes in logic.... Self-evidence, which [Bertrand] Russell talked about so much, can be dispensable in logic, only because language itself prevents every logical mistake.--What makes logic a priori is the impossibility of illogical thought. --Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus   3.03, 3.031, 3.032, 5.473, 5.4731 (H/T: Roderick T. Long )      
Read more

Is He Having a Laugh?

According to the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, the government is God's appointed agent on earth, and each of us owes it allegiance and obedience. If that's so--and I for one don't believe either part of that statement--I'd like some believer to explain what God had in mind when he arranged things so that one of the two major-party clowns running for president will be elected in November. Is He having a laugh?
Read more

Happy Passover, 2024

In an earlier incarnation many, many years ago, I would be getting ready to celebrate Passover . This is the holiday that commemorates Yahweh's liberation of the children of Israel from enslavement in Egypt (long before the Arabs got there). Yahweh did this, according to the Good Book, by inflicting collective punishments on the Egyptian people -- ranging from turning the Nile River and other water sources into blood, to sending swarms of frogs, gnats, flies, and locusts throughout the land, to killing all first-born persons and cattle, even those of slaves (non-Israelites, presumably) -- 10 "plagues" in all. As unjust as that collective punishment seems, it was Yahweh's response to the recalcitrance of Egypt's absolute ruler, the Pharaoh. According to the story, he repeatedly changed his mind about "letting [the Israelite] people go" after promising Moses he would do so. That's why Egypt, that is, all Egyptians, kept getting hit with plagues.  Howe...
Read more