Posts

Showing posts from August 16, 2020

Is a Necessary Being Really Necessary?

The Ontological Argument maintains that the existence of an absolutely necessary being cannot be denied without self-contradiction. This concept of God, Kant says, is logically possible (i.e., it does not contain a contradiction), but we can never establish that something [exists] from a mere analysis of the corresponding concept. Real  possibility can never be inferred from logical  possibility. Indeed, a concept may be logically possible and yet cognitively empty, if it is impossible to conceive what it would be like to experience such a being. This latter point is important because, according to the Ontological Argument, if we can possibly conceive of an absolutely necessary being (God), then God must necessarily exist. Why? Because it would supposedly be contradictory to deny the existence of a being whose existence is absolutely necessary. If it is possible for the most real being to exist, then it must necessarily exist, because existence is part of [what] it means to be "mo